News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by simulator5g on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @01:38AM (#45808024)
Having seen photocopiers so many times produce coherent, sensible, and valid chains of words on a page, I am at this point in absolutely no doubt that they are thinking.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by efitz on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @03:00AM (#45808518)
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by bayindirh on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @03:21AM (#45808647)
That's not a flaw. That model's creativity tuned a bit too high. It's a happy little copier which can be a little creative and unconventional with reasoning, at times.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by Zardoz84 on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @02:59AM (#45808516)
I saw Dr. Abuse producing coherent, sensible and valid chains of words, running on a 386.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by throwaway-0001 on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @05:18AM (#45809320)
I’ve seen so many humans bring stupid. Definitively there is nothing in the brain.

You see how doesn’t make sense what you saying?

Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by slightwinder on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @05:40AM (#45809483)
Photocopiers are the opposite of thinking. What goes in, goes out, no transformation or creating of new data at all. Any change is just an accident, or an artifact of the technical process.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by HarHarVeryFunny on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @07:24AM (#45810094)
That's not actually true - try photocopying a banknote with the security pattern on it.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by slightwinder on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @09:11AM (#45811240)
True, modern Photocopiers are not really Photocopiers any more and just a pc with scanner and printer. Those could be described as "thinking", in the same sense as any computer is thinking. But from my understanding, the original comment was explicitly about a pure copy-device, without any "brain" involved.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by _boffin_ on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @09:59AM (#45811737)
That has a logic condition, no?
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by HarHarVeryFunny on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @10:22AM (#45812018)
Not sure what you mean - there's a pattern of dots (the EURion constellation) on the banknotes of a number of countries that photocopiers recognize and will refuse to copy.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by _boffin_ on Wednesday November 05, 2025 @10:57AM (#45824319)
I could have been more descriptive, but yes, exactly what you described. The logic of: if i see this exact pattern, refuse to duplicate or make extremely apparent it's a fake.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by justinclift on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @06:46AM (#45809863)
So, if there's a flaw in its sensor and you get somewhat warped output, would you consider it thinking then?
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by slightwinder on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @07:03AM (#45809982)
No, because it is not intentional.
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by justinclift on Friday November 07, 2025 @03:30AM (#45844573)
Hmmm, so if I know some of them have warped optics, so then arrange a few to produce interesting (to me) output, are they thinking then? :)
Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by Libidinalecon on Tuesday November 04, 2025 @06:39PM (#45817199)
It is the wrong category error.

The proper category error in the context of the discussion would be to say the photocopier is drawing a picture.

It doesn't matter how well or not the photocopier recreates an image. To say the photocopier is drawing a picture is just nonsense and has no meaning.

The same category error as to say the LLM is "thinking".

Of course, the category error could be well exploited for marketing purposes if you are in the business of selling photocopiers or language models.

Re:The Case That A.I. Is Thinking by m_rpn on Friday November 07, 2025 @07:03AM (#45845588)
easily top 10 best HN comment ever.