Re:Show HN: Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing?...
by iliaxj on Sunday November 02, 2025 @08:28PM
(#45795038)
Sometimes it doesn't though. Sometimes the engine seizes because a piece of tubing broke and you left your coolant down the road two turns ago. Or you steer off a cliff because there was coolant on the road for some reason. Or the meat sack in front of the wheel just didn't get enough sleep and your response time is degraded and you just can't quite get the thing to feel how you usually do. Ultimately the failure rate is low enough to trust your life on it, but that's just a matter of degree.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing?...
by pepoluan on Sunday November 02, 2025 @09:13PM
(#45795255)
The situations you described reflects a System that has changed. And if the System has changed, then a change in output is to be expected.
It's the same as having a function called "factorial" but you change the multiplication operation to addition instead.
Re:Show HN: Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing?...
by chii on Sunday November 02, 2025 @09:40PM
(#45795371)
all of those situations are the "driver's own fault", because they could've had a check to ensure none of that happened before driving. Not true with an LLM (at least, not as of today).