Re:Lording it, over: A new history of the modern British ari...
by smcin on Friday October 31, 2025 @09:19PM
(#45778460)
Presumably GP meant readers would be unlikely to understand 'Windsor' referred specifically to AMW.
Re:Lording it, over: A new history of the modern British ari...
by horisbrisby on Saturday November 01, 2025 @04:58AM
(#45780227)
I'm not sure I understand the royal system that well, but I think a journalists that refrains from acting on the change in demarcation or invents a new demarcation to go with his effective notability remaining would be acting out a bit of heresy against the royal monopoly on titles.
Re:Lording it, over: A new history of the modern British ari...
by smcin on Saturday November 01, 2025 @05:30PM
(#45785585)
I meant general audiences would not understand a one-word reference to 'Windsor' (single word) as meaning 'The person FKA Prince Andrew'. Whereas 'AMW'/'Andrew Mountbatten Windsor' might. 'Windsor' until now referred to the entire UK Royal Family, various towns, the castle in Berkshire, the tie knot, etc.
Re:Lording it, over: A new history of the modern British ari...
by pseudalopex on Sunday November 02, 2025 @10:13AM
(#45790882)
I believe general audiences would understand a reference to Windsor to mean the person called Andrew Mountbatten Windsor in the previous sentence. The royal family are called the royal family most commonly. Various towns, the castle, and the tie knot were not in context.
Why?