Re:Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005)
by fargolime on Wednesday September 26, 2012 @03:20PM
(#4577471)
Linking would be going too far off topic, which I won't do. It would indicate an ulterior motive I don't have.
You'd need at least a good laymen's background in relativity theory to understand my work. If you have that, you can give me a way to contact you and I'll do that after this discussion has scrolled off others' lists.
You'd need at least a good laymen's background in relativity theory to understand my work. If you have that, you can give me a way to contact you and I'll do that after this discussion has scrolled off others' lists.