News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005) by VMG on Wednesday September 26, 2012 @02:52PM (#4577316)
Because in most cases, that conclusion is correct as well.

Your refusal to link to the actual PDFs doesn't inspire confidence either. You claim breakthroughs and leave us hanging, which isn't very nice.

Re:Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005) by fargolime on Wednesday September 26, 2012 @03:20PM (#4577471)
Linking would be going too far off topic, which I won't do. It would indicate an ulterior motive I don't have.

You'd need at least a good laymen's background in relativity theory to understand my work. If you have that, you can give me a way to contact you and I'll do that after this discussion has scrolled off others' lists.

Re:Fictional peer reviews rejecting famous papers (2005) by gknoy on Wednesday September 26, 2012 @07:51PM (#4578629)
You could also link to your website in your user summary, and have it easily accessible for tangential conversations.