Re:Carlo Rovelli’s radical perspective on reality
by rhubarbtree on Thursday October 30, 2025 @03:11AM
(#45757198)
Not a physicist but this echoes my feelings when people talk about time as an emergent phenomenon.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Carlo Rovelli’s radical perspective on reality
by measurablefunc on Thursday October 30, 2025 @04:19AM
(#45757574)
I'm not a physicist either but this stuff isn't magic. Most of the mathematics used by physicists isn't complicated if you've managed to get past calculus.
Re:Carlo Rovelli’s radical perspective on reality
by GOD_Over_Djinn on Friday October 31, 2025 @05:37AM
(#45770048)
At this point, numerous exotic mathematical tools from Langlands program, Lie algebras, algebraic geometry and topology have been used in physics.
I do agree that you can go quite far with calculus, linear algebra, and probability. But I do think that you overstate the case.
Re:Carlo Rovelli’s radical perspective on reality
by measurablefunc on Friday October 31, 2025 @06:50PM
(#45777577)
Algebraic geometry isn't any more complicated than multi-variable calculus. It's certainly more abstract but you get used to it after a while. Schemes¹ are not difficult to learn if you know basic commutative algebra & topology. If you don't know basic commutative algebra then you'll have a tougher time but it's again something that can be learned w/ enough practice & patience.
¹https://webhomes.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/eisenbudhar...