News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Poker Tournament for LLMs by CamperBob2 on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @07:01PM (#45740449)
Set the temperature to zero and that's exactly what you get.

In some NN implementations, randomness is actually pretty important to keep the gradients from getting stuck at local minima/maxima. Is that true for LLMs, or is it not something that applies at all?

Re:Poker Tournament for LLMs by eru on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @02:58AM (#45743497)
Are you talking about training?
Re:Poker Tournament for LLMs by CamperBob2 on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @01:26PM (#45750138)
I'm not sure, hence the question. AFAIK temperature only comes into play at inference time once the distribution is known, but I don't know if there are other places where random numbers are involved.
Re:Poker Tournament for LLMs by eru on Wednesday October 29, 2025 @09:05PM (#45755212)
Yes, lots of other randomness.

Eg you tend to randomly shuffle your corpus to train on. If you use drop-out (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilution_(neural_networks)) you use randomness. You might also randomly perturb your training data. Lots of other sources of randomness that you might want to try.