While ChatGPT tells me it's unable to access the linked page directly from Grokipedia (lolol), I was able to download the content, copy/paste it into ChatGPT, and ask it to fact check it. I think I will do this more often, with other sites (and other models) as well, going forward, as Chat is able to categorize statements as being correct vs. misleading vs. flat out wrong.

> The article does seem a bit much though. I've noticed a lot of the Grokipedia articles just go on.

And yes, that's what I'm noticing as well. There is a clear attempt to establish a narrative.

Among the more obvious errors are short runs to UIC/Halsted and a northwestern trajectory along Lake St from the loop.

But yes, it also suffers from attention to irrelevant detail.

Keeping with the Green theme the page on Green's Functions (https://grokipedia.com/page/Green's_function) sounds like it's having a stroke

The problem I have with most AI output like this is that it's just a huge wall of text that doesn't really say anything.