Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by gehwartzen on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @10:38AM
(#45733456)
This is exactly why they will have an “expert panel” to make that determination. They wouldn’t make something up
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by cmiles74 on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @11:13AM
(#45733922)
I expect that the "expert panel" is to ensure that OpenAI and Microsoft are in agreement on what "AGI" means in the context of this agreement.
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by some_furry on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @11:10AM
(#45733875)
What exactly is the criteria for "expert" they're planning to use, and whomst among us can actually meet a realistic bar for expertise on the nature of consciousness?
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by Fuzzwah on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @01:43PM
(#45736154)
Follower count on X. /s
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by ctoth on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @04:26PM
(#45738667)
Type error: why do you need an expert on consciousness to weigh in on if something is AGI or not? I don't care what it feels like to be a paperclip maximizer I just care to not have my paperclips maximized tnx.
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by noobcoder on Thursday October 30, 2025 @12:46AM
(#45756528)
qualify: if you’ve hosted a podcast about simulation theory or own more than one turtleneck
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by alterom on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @10:54AM
(#45733673)
Yeah, they wouldn't make something up, the expert panel would.
Because everyone knows that once you call a group of people an expert panel, that automatically means they can't be biased /s