Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by htrp on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @10:25AM
(#45733306)
FSD would like a word
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by waffletower on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @11:30AM
(#45734178)
As a full stack developer suffering from female sexual dysfunction who owns a Tesla, I am really confused about what you are trying to say.
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by CoastalCoder on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @02:49PM
(#45737110)
Have you tried praying to the Flying Spaghetti Deity?
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by bravetraveler on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @03:38PM
(#45737936)
After wrapping up with the Family Services Division, of course
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by sgustard on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @11:42AM
(#45734327)
SAE automation levels are the industry standard, not FSD (which is a brand name), and FSD is clearly Level 2 (driver is always responsible and must be engaged, at least in consumer teslas, I don't know about robotaxis). The question is if "AGI" is as well defined as "Level 5" as an independent standard.
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by jgalt212 on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @02:10PM
(#45736584)
The point trying to be made is FSD is deceptive marketing, and it's unbelievable how long that "marketing term" has been allowed to exist given its inaccuracy in representing what is actually being delivered to the customer.
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by Spooky23 on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @03:57PM
(#45738246)
What's deceptive? What in the term "Full Self Driving" makes you think that your car will drive itself fully? It's fully capable of facilitating your driving of yourself, clearly.
Re:The next chapter of the Microsoft–OpenAI partnership
by mberning on Tuesday October 28, 2025 @11:09AM
(#45733858)
They have certainly tried to move the goalposts on this.