>> Right instead they want the flow to continue so they can create a private prison system filled with immigrants.

How does this make sense when cities and states have openly declared themselves "sanctuary cities" for illegal immigrants?

How does this work when so many of the prisons are already overflowing? So much so, judges and prosecutors are not capable of sending more people to prisons and instead use diversion programs, down charging, or dismissing more serious crimes to charge these people with lesser crimes specifically in order to avoid jail time? What about states like Minnesota that continually deviate from sentencing guidelines and allow people convicted of crimes to spend the majority of their sentence out of prison? Minnesota isn't the only state that does this either, its just in the top five who do this.

The evidence would overwhelming appear to directly contradict this theory.

You're ignoring some pretty crucial evidence about this administration, which is that:

A) They're building more prisons specifically to fill with immigrants

B) Sentencing trends don't really affect immigrants who are denied due process.

>> A) They're building more prisons specifically to fill with immigrants

Correction: They're building more prisons specifically to fill with ILLEGAL immigrants. The vast majority of whom have committed crimes while here.

If you have a problem with criminals being put in jail then you have a much bigger problem with your moral compass.

Those in the US without documentation (a valid visa, green card, citizenship, etc.) are not criminals. The vast majority are folks who overstayed their visas. Doing so is not a crime. It's a civil tort. That's the law in the US.

Why are you advocating breaking the law by treating non-criminals like criminals?