Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by almosthere on Saturday October 25, 2025 @11:01PM
(#45708809)
Is he going to die no matter what or is this survivable?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by jasongill on Saturday October 25, 2025 @11:06PM
(#45708825)
Ultimately, yes; he will die no matter what.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by almosthere on Saturday October 25, 2025 @11:08PM
(#45708836)
As you get older this pedantry gets really tiring.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by brongondwana on Saturday October 25, 2025 @11:26PM
(#45708907)
The good news is, you have less time to be annoyed by it
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by IncreasePosts on Sunday October 26, 2025 @01:05AM
(#45709301)
Personally, my belief in my own immortality only increases the older I get. Yes, Socrates died, but he clearly wasn't smart if he died. Me, on the other hand? I'm batting a thousand.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by yard2010 on Sunday October 26, 2025 @01:19AM
(#45709344)
Would it kill you? Well, ultimately yes..
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by lgas on Sunday October 26, 2025 @03:38AM
(#45709837)
Not necessarily. Could get hit by a car later the same day.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by dooglius on Sunday October 26, 2025 @02:12AM
(#45709521)
There is a deeper point here, not just pedantry. The point is that harm is a spectrum not a binary and one cannot meaningfully answer a question that assumes a binary.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by lwhi on Sunday October 26, 2025 @03:35AM
(#45709825)
Yes, there is a such a thing as a bad question after all.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by kmbfjr on Sunday October 26, 2025 @02:28PM
(#45714107)
(Tired quip “you must be new here”)
Yes, it is tiring. In this case, not really because it is at least for me, humorous in a Doc Martin sort of way. But elsewhere and on places like Reddit where the pedantry is often at best unjustified and at worst, wrong, it has made me spend less time on the sites.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by hshdhdhehd on Sunday October 26, 2025 @01:21AM
(#45709356)
Unprovable.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by thayne on Saturday October 25, 2025 @11:22PM
(#45708891)
I'm not an expert but it definitely doesn't sound like an immediate threat to his life.
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by hunterpayne on Sunday October 26, 2025 @03:24AM
(#45709774)
He will be fine. He might not still have his job in a few months but other that, he will be fine. 300 CPM isn't even close to dangerous. You get a higher dose every time you fly in an airplane, or go to La Paz, Bolivia.
> They ingested some amount of cavity water
Isn't it much worse internally than hitting your outer skin?
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by orwin on Sunday October 26, 2025 @07:04AM
(#45710780)
Yes, but: depends on what he ingested. Deuterium/tritium cannot emit Alpha particles, the ones blocked by your outer/dead skin (also they're an order of magnitude more dangerous than the other at equivalent grey), so he's fine in that way (unless there is more in the pool, but that would be a bigger issue).
The issue with ingesting deuterium/tritium is that the dose will now have to be calculated/estimated per organ, and while I don't remember exactly how it's done, it's more complex than calculating the mSv he took (I can't give you more details, I'm not competent, I've observed a radiologist a week my bachelor year to decide which master I would do, I'm now working in software which should tell you everything)
Re:A worker fell into a nuclear reactor pool
by kevincox on Sunday October 26, 2025 @11:35AM
(#45712726)
According to https://www.mlive.com/news/2025/10/michigan-nuclear-plant-wo... he returned to work the next day (presumably at the nuclear reactor) and only suffered minor injuries due to the fall.