Sora might have a 'pervert' problem on its hands

Re:Sora might have a 'pervert' problem on its hands by busymom0 on Saturday October 25, 2025 @08:42PM (#45708143)

> I've allowed anyone to make "cameos" using my face. (You don't have to do this: You can choose settings that make your likeness private, or open to just your friends — but I figured, why not? And left my likeness open to everyone, just like Sam Altman.)

So the author specifically allowed their face to be used for content and then is surprised people acted on it? This is silly imo.

People should just never even allow their face to be used for this.

This reminds me of the "Joanne is awful" episode from black mirror. Exact same story.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sora might have a 'pervert' problem on its hands by mslt on Saturday October 25, 2025 @10:44PM (#45708751)

You’re treating this article as an attack when it’s not one. She turned it on to see what would happen, because she’s a technology reporter, and then reported on what happened. And her reporting isn’t even all that negative.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sora might have a 'pervert' problem on its hands by sathackr on Saturday October 25, 2025 @08:49PM (#45708178)

Rule 34

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sora might have a 'pervert' problem on its hands by portaouflop on Saturday October 25, 2025 @08:46PM (#45708162)

Tbh if you are sufficiently famous or have a bunch of pictures of you available online you don’t need to opt-in.

So this is silly yes but people can still easily make deepfake porn of you from any photo available with other oss tools

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Sora might have a 'pervert' problem on its hands by Aeolun on Saturday October 25, 2025 @08:50PM (#45708184)

Sure, but then they’re not immediately public on Sora xD

[ Parent | on HN ]