Re:Counter-Strike's player economy is in a multi-billion dol...
by charcircuit on Friday October 24, 2025 @05:43AM
(#45692749)
Virtual items are legitimate investments.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Counter-Strike's player economy is in a multi-billion dol...
by bargainbin on Friday October 24, 2025 @07:47AM
(#45693634)
Anything you put money into is a legitimate investment.
This doesn’t mean they’re viable investments.
Re:Counter-Strike's player economy is in a multi-billion dol...
by immibis on Friday October 24, 2025 @11:57AM
(#45695916)
IMO the phrase "legitimate investment" should be reserved for situations where you spend money something (e.g. kitchen equipment) that allows you to create new real-world value (e.g. food) which you can hopefully sell for a profit (it's still a legitimate investment if that fails). It should not be used for Ponzi schemes, gambling, outright fraud, or anything of the sort. Buying something and then hoping its price goes up before you sell it should not be called investing, but gambling - unless it fits in the category I just described.
Re:Counter-Strike's player economy is in a multi-billion dol...
by charcircuit on Friday October 24, 2025 @11:23PM
(#45701148)
People find value in acquiring things they want. For example if someone wants to have a one letter username on X, there is value for there to be willing to sell one.
Re:Counter-Strike's player economy is in a multi-billion dol...
by immibis on Saturday October 25, 2025 @04:04PM
(#45706571)
This is why I said "new real-world value". An X username does not have real-world value in the same way that potatoes have real-world value.
Re:Counter-Strike's player economy is in a multi-billion dol...
by BigTTYGothGF on Friday October 24, 2025 @11:18AM
(#45695555)
You can't even use slurp juice on CS skins.