Whether it’s “stupid” remains to be seen. I personally would not have made this choice at this point in time, but the way some people seem to consider “Rust program has a bug” to be newsworthy is… odd.

> but the way some people seem to consider “Rust program has a bug” to be newsworthy is… odd.

But the fact that program X was written in Rust is, on the other hand, newsworthy? And there is nothing odd in the fact that the first property of the software that is advertised is the fact that it was made in Rust.

Yeah, nothing odd there.

> to consider “Rust program has a bug” to be newsworthy is… odd.

That's not why it is newsworthy though.

"A project reimplementing core OS programs for the sake of reimplementing in the favourite language breaks stable OS", is what makes it newsworthy.

Having unimplemented features makes a thing stupid?

Rewriting already perfectly working and feature-complete software and advertising your version as a superior replacement while neglecting to implement existing features that users relied on is pretty stupid, yes.

Need I remind you what coreutils or Linux (re)implement?

Replacing a program which implements these features and is a core foundation of the OS, which one that doesn't, to mock people not using the latest language is.