News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:PyTorch Monarch by SomaticPirate on Thursday October 23, 2025 @10:12AM (#45682019)
"Our Rust-based backend facilitates our performance, scale, and robustness — we amply use Rust’s fearless concurrency in Monarch’s implementation"

Found a few typo's. The em dash makes me suspect an LLM was involved in proofreading

Re:PyTorch Monarch by alt187 on Thursday October 23, 2025 @10:29AM (#45682210)
Re:PyTorch Monarch by geedzmo on Thursday October 23, 2025 @11:13AM (#45682785)
That was a really good read. Glad I clicked
Re:PyTorch Monarch by alt187 on Thursday October 23, 2025 @11:33AM (#45683043)
It's not even one of the funniest pieces of the author, and that says a lot.
Re:PyTorch Monarch by hellohello2 on Thursday October 23, 2025 @11:24AM (#45682933)
I would argue that typos suggest an LLM did not proofread.
Re:PyTorch Monarch by whimsicalism on Thursday October 23, 2025 @11:03AM (#45682682)
that it is surrounded by spaces makes this less likely
Re:PyTorch Monarch by ComputerGuru on Thursday October 23, 2025 @02:03PM (#45684878)
Most style guides would call that an error, em dash should be used without surrounding spaces (while an en dash requires them). The only publication I know that has (recently?) eschewed that advice is WaPo. If the idea was to make it more visible, I believe the correct solution would have been for WaPo to use an en dash but render it longer in their typeface.
Re:PyTorch Monarch by whimsicalism on Thursday October 23, 2025 @03:13PM (#45685654)
yes, i agree with you and this is how i used to use emdashes. chatgpt also agrees with you, which is why spaces are a pretty good indicator that it's not an LLM