News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push?. Parent comment

Re:Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push? by throwaway091025 on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @11:03AM (#45670231)
Maybe the fact that your mother didn't pasteurize her milk when you were a child?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push? by ceejayoz on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @11:10AM (#45670352)
Pasteurization was discovered in 1860s, so she probably didn't have to. It was made mandatory starting in the late 1940s in the US.

Prior to that, a whole bunch of folks got TB from it.

If you're referring to breast milk, your mother probably wasn't raised in a dairy farm.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push? by deepanwadhwa on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @11:11AM (#45670378)
Are you directly sucking the cow? If yes, I'd support you drinking raw milk.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push? by spacechild1 on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @11:12AM (#45670381)
> her milk

Are you seriously equating breast milk with cow milk? Or did I misinterpret your post?

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Who benefits from the MAHA anti-science push? by sceptic123 on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @12:02PM (#45671177)
I read it more as a suggestion that the parent poster's mother was a cow
[ Parent | on HN ]