News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Evaluating the Infinity Cache in AMD Strix Halo. Parent comment

Re:Evaluating the Infinity Cache in AMD Strix Halo by noelwelsh on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @02:21AM (#45665469)
This article from the same site goes into the Infinity Cache design in a bit more detail: https://chipsandcheese.com/p/amds-cdna-3-compute-architectur...

The summary is that it's a cache attached to the memory controllers, rather than the CPUs, so it doesn't have to worry about cache coherency so much. This could be useful for shared memory parallelism.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evaluating the Infinity Cache in AMD Strix Halo by joelthelion on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @02:23AM (#45665492)
Thank you!
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evaluating the Infinity Cache in AMD Strix Halo by jbreitbart on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @08:03AM (#45667781)
Since it is attached to the memory controller, one could argue that it is truly the final level of the cache hierarchy and the term infinity is not only a marketing term.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evaluating the Infinity Cache in AMD Strix Halo by ot on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @09:18AM (#45668674)
But then you could add another level of slower (but still faster than RAM) and larger cache. So it is after all the CPU caches, but the first of all the memory caches. A more mathematically correct name would be L_omega.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evaluating the Infinity Cache in AMD Strix Halo by p_l on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @09:28AM (#45668849)
IBM Power8 and Power9 used Centaur chips which had similar "last level cache" onboard.

Because it is last level before the actual ram chips, no coherency involved.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evaluating the Infinity Cache in AMD Strix Halo by MisterTea on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @10:46AM (#45669934)
Sounds a bit like a tightly coupled memory (TCM) in an embedded CPU; Fast single cycle RAM shared across the system.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Evaluating the Infinity Cache in AMD Strix Halo by ignaloidas on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @10:54AM (#45670067)
This is quite exactly the opposite of TCM in fact
[ Parent | on HN ]