News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server by rapind on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @08:08PM (#45663412)
Honestly I think it's the database that makes devs insecure. The stakes are high and you usually want PITR and regular backups even for low traffic apps. Having a "simple" turnkey service for this that can run in any environment (dedicated, VPS, colo, etc.) would be huge.

I think this is partly responsible for the increased popularity of sqlite as a backend. It's super simple and lightstream for recovery isn't that complicated.

Most apps don't need 5 9s, but they do care about losing data. Eliminate the possibility of losing data, without paying tons of $ to also eliminate potential outages, and you'll get a lot of customers.

Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server by tonyhart7 on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @10:36PM (#45664319)
isn't that just neon db???? but without losing data part
Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server by rapind on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @12:34AM (#45664910)
Neon is definitely way more complex than what I'm talking about.