Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server
by sodality2 on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @05:32PM
(#45661995)
Do you plan on keeping it in your home? At that point I'd be worried about ISP networking or power guarantees unless you plan on upgrading to business rates for both. If you mean colo, well, if you're sure you'll be using it in X years, it's worth it, but the flexibility of month-to-month might be preferable.
Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server
by SchemaLoad on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @05:44PM
(#45662116)
Because that used desktop is subject to power outages, internet outages, the cleaners unplugging it, etc. Datacenters have redundancy on everything.
Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server
by eru on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @08:25PM
(#45663560)
Also you still have to pay for the electricity on that thing.
The cloud costs includes everything.
Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server
by jopsen on Wednesday October 22, 2025 @06:24AM
(#45667056)
Not to mention physical security.
Breaking into a home is relatively easy.
And unless you live in the US and is willing to actually shot someone (with all the paperwork that entails, as well as physical and legal risks), the fact is that you can't actually stop a burglary.
Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server
by ngold on Thursday October 23, 2025 @02:28AM
(#45678805)
I'm probably wrong, but this argument always cracks me up.
It used to be called 3 laptops a power scrubber and a backup battery. If you want to go self hosting things. If you were fancy you had two servers.
Re:Replacing a $3000/mo Heroku bill with a $55/mo server
by marcosdumay on Tuesday October 21, 2025 @09:35PM
(#45663986)
And you'll need some $100/month to colocate that thing, so you are better spending some more and buying a reasonable server that uses only 1U.
As cloud marches on it continues to seem like a grift.