News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Novo Nordisk's Canadian Mistake by philipallstar on Monday October 20, 2025 @06:45AM (#45642403)
Then they'd be better off removing this section if "editorially independent" means "we will take things that even in their headline may not be true at all".
Re:Novo Nordisk's Canadian Mistake by jbrnh on Monday October 20, 2025 @06:58AM (#45642498)
It's a blog. It references an interview. The post is also four month old. "In the Pipeline" is generally a fantastic resource on the pharma industry and chemistry news.
Re:Novo Nordisk's Canadian Mistake by philipallstar on Monday October 20, 2025 @09:34AM (#45643723)
> It's a blog.

Not really. It doesn't look like a blog, and it's not a person/org's specific blog post. It's just called "blog" in a breadcrumb somewhere, which most people won't read. It's actual a guest editorial, but still - doesn't really look like one.

Re:Novo Nordisk's Canadian Mistake by devilbunny on Monday October 20, 2025 @10:25AM (#45644253)
> it's not a person/org's specific blog post

Yeah, it really is, even if what's linked to is one post rather than the entire blog.

His stuff pops up here often enough. He really does blog at Science. Has for years and years.

If you have a background in chemistry, it's fairly accessible (i.e., he very rarely talks about anything in a depth that an undergrad chem major would have trouble understanding - which, given that most chemists start branching off very quickly in grad school, is roughly the appropriate depth for writing intended for a general chemistry audience, since it's the last common knowledge level).

Re:Novo Nordisk's Canadian Mistake by SAI_Peregrinus on Monday October 20, 2025 @10:04AM (#45644064)
> Derek Lowe’s commentary on drug discovery and the pharma industry. An editorially independent blog, all content is Derek’s own, and he does not in any way speak for his employer.

The top of the sidebar describes what "In the Pipeline" is.