Re:Acrobat is intrusive, slow and non-customizable
by dunham on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @08:12PM
(#45599994)
I haven't had it crash. Typically my documents are under a 300 pages (either academic books or papers), but occasionally I use the PDF reference, which is 1300 pages.
Re:Acrobat is intrusive, slow and non-customizable
by crooked-v on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @08:06PM
(#45599935)
For me the default alternative to Preview is PDF Expert. It's very zippy and it has the quality of life stuff that other readers leave out, like editing bookmarks.
Re:Acrobat is intrusive, slow and non-customizable
by sharma-arjun on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @09:25PM
(#45600467)
Skim is amazing, I've never had it crash on large documents or with keyword searches as Preview almost always does. Also has a great note-taking system for scientific / academic work. Not sure why it flies under the radar so much.
Re:Acrobat is intrusive, slow and non-customizable
by gsinclair on Thursday October 16, 2025 @02:53AM
(#45602190)
I’ve had Skim crash on me several times. I still like it though.
Re:Acrobat is intrusive, slow and non-customizable
by the-mitr on Thursday October 16, 2025 @05:04AM
(#45603078)
I used preview to annotate pdf for copyediting. It was modest 100 page text only doc. After about 70 pages or so preview crashed and the file became corrupted with no way to recover the annotation or comments. Never used preview for annotation there after. But as a viewer is good
PDF readers I actually like: Zathura (obviously), sioyek (if you like customizability and Vim-like bindings, this is a good one!), and Skim.
Everything else tries to do too much (read: be an Acrobat substitute).