Re:I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'
by jibal on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @06:08PM
(#45598886)
Yes, it's an informative and important article. I think the complaints here are absurd. Hopefully the people not reading it for silly reasons won't become the victims of similar social engineering.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'
by anonymars on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @07:46PM
(#45599777)
I find all the whining about the AI help to be far more annoying and distracting than the AI itself
Re:I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'
by mat_b on Wednesday October 15, 2025 @11:56PM
(#45601289)
Agree. People need to chill out. I thought there might be some discussion in the comments about the scam. Unfortunately, no. Complete waste of time to read and much more annoying than the original article.
Re:I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'
by anonymars on Thursday October 16, 2025 @08:32AM
(#45604560)
Between that, the seemingly excessive skepticism it happened, and "lol blockchain was your first mistake", I half-wondered if it wasn't a deliberate effort to dilute the alarm bells that we should all learn from here
Then I had a different thought: perhaps it's a mental defense mechanism at the unease at realizing how plausible it would be for many of us to fall prey to this scam
Anyway. Bizarre.
Re:I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'
by chipsrafferty on Friday October 17, 2025 @11:55AM
(#45618189)
Easy to fix - don't publish AI Slop, and we can have an interesting discussion
Re:I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'
by jibal on Friday October 17, 2025 @11:01PM
(#45624545)
Intelligent and intellectually honest people can have an interesting discussion about articles that the author used LLM to clean up.
Re:I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'
by anonymars on Saturday October 18, 2025 @07:35AM
(#45626536)
There's a difference between "AI slop" and AI copyediting
Re:I almost got hacked by a 'job interview'
by redherring22 on Thursday October 16, 2025 @09:07AM
(#45604857)
This isn't a groundbreaking article. We already knew about this kind of scam, so why trudge through an article written by an LLM doing its best Linkedin grifter impression?