News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California Will Stop Using Coal as a Power Source Next Month by kjkjadksj on Monday October 13, 2025 @01:56PM (#45571363)
15b over 10 years is small money these days in terms of public infrastructure.
Re:California Will Stop Using Coal as a Power Source Next Month by lesuorac on Monday October 13, 2025 @03:50PM (#45572593)
The public is generally not allowed to finance nuclear. I don't know about your state but a lot of them don't allow for rate payers to finance new construction so the interest payments need to be covered by the profit margin until the plant is operational and then you can start using the electric rate to pay off the principal of the loan.

This is a giant issue with nuclear as you're going to be financing it for decades while solar/natural gas will be producing in a year or two.

Re:California Will Stop Using Coal as a Power Source Next Month by mikeyouse on Monday October 13, 2025 @02:28PM (#45571738)
It’s more of an opportunity cost issue than anything else. That $15B nuke plant will need to sell power at $0.15 wholesale or some such figure to break even. You need to give them $15B today for the promise of power generation revenue in 10+ years — or you could spend $1.5B/year building all sorts of other generation and earn commiserate revenue within months after groundbreaking.

New nuke power is something like 5x more expensive than wind or solar — which buys a lot of storage. Existing nuke power is ~about the same cost as renewables so it’s obvious we should keep them running but the case for building new ones is really hard to make.