News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple Designs a Virtual Knob by duped on Saturday October 11, 2025 @05:15PM (#45552774)
If you've ever used pro audio software you come to love rotary over linear sliders. They're simply more flexible and dense when you have many parameters to tweak.
Re:Apple Designs a Virtual Knob by kowbell on Saturday October 11, 2025 @05:35PM (#45552912)
Linear sliders are also finite, while rotary encoders can spin forever.
Re:Apple Designs a Virtual Knob by siriaan on Saturday October 11, 2025 @05:59PM (#45553047)
In the physical world, sure, but there's no reason why a virtual linear slide could not be made endless
Re:Apple Designs a Virtual Knob by squeaky-clean on Sunday October 12, 2025 @03:52AM (#45556215)
You'd have a discontinuity. A knob naturally rotates back to its start. A slider never does and would have to pacman-wrap itself back to the start.

There's no motion you could make that would infinitely increase without a break. A knob you can just move your cursor in a clockwise circle infinitely.

Re:Apple Designs a Virtual Knob by baxuz on Saturday October 11, 2025 @06:02PM (#45553061)
Yeah but that doesn't have much value as you lose the value indicator.

If you don't need a value indicator, you don't need a circular knob as an affordance. You can have a whatever as it just reacts to your input.

If you do have a value indicator which is "infinite", such as a numerical value display, it's better to make it interactive and place the interaction on top of it, instead of splitting the UI between a value indicator and the input.

A lot of software does this.