News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by exe34 on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @11:03AM (#45516985)
doesn't it defeat the point of a contract?
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by blochist on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @12:22PM (#45517867)
Usually "unilateral amendments" are allowed via the contract terms, so it's part of the original contract.
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by exe34 on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @01:32PM (#45518572)
so you might as well sign a blank sheet. why bother with a contract?
Re:The email they shouldn't have read by rcxdude on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @02:12PM (#45518983)
As written they are usually a Hobson's choice - accept the new terms or terminate the agreement. So the other party can't throw something completely heinous in there. But it does open you up to all kinds of issues, especially if accepting the new terms is implicit in taking no action, since this kind of thing can easily wind up ignored in an organisation.