Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by zeroflow on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @07:35AM
(#45514959)
I often read that take. Yes, the J4125 was fine for a few easy / low effort transcodes, like 1080p to 720p for mobile streaming.
But I'm with you. The rest is fine, not great, but rather working well enough.
Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by lobsterthief on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @07:01AM
(#45514702)
I bought an inexpensive used Mac Mini and attached a standard HDD USB3 enclosure to it with multiple drives. Works great for streaming to any network appliance I want to use.
Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by bombcar on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @11:47AM
(#45517453)
I gave up on transcoding and just recoded everything into the format the Apple TV with Infuse wants.
But my “NAS” is ex-lease enterprise server.
Re:Synology reverses policy banning third-party HDDs after s...
by tracker1 on Wednesday October 08, 2025 @01:05PM
(#45518316)
I now have a mini pc next to my NAS, and leaving my NAS to only file storage chores. That said, I also am running NVidia Shield TV Pro boxes with Kodi for local media and largely don't have to worry about the encoding.
Transcoding was the reason I moved away from Synology. The rest was fine, not great but ... Okay
But there was no way to improve transcoding performance. If a stream lagged, it would always lag. Hence I jumped ship and just made my own