Clock on iOS6 iPads is an homage to a 1944 design by Hans Hilfiker

Re:Clock on iOS6 iPads is an homage to a 1944 design by Hans... by pazimzadeh on Thursday September 20, 2012 @01:55PM (#4549751)

I would say tribute, not copy. The calculator app resembles the 1977 Braun calculator: http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2007/07/iphones-design/.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clock on iOS6 iPads is an homage to a 1944 design by Hans... by pan69 on Thursday September 20, 2012 @04:44PM (#4550581)

Ah OK. So when Apple steals design its a tribute but when Samsung does it it's stealing. Noted.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clock on iOS6 iPads is an homage to a 1944 design by Hans... by mdiep on Thursday September 20, 2012 @05:02PM (#4550665)

I think the argument is that if Apple made a calculator that looked like the Braun one it would be stealing. But since it's not the same type of device, it's a tribute. I'm not sure if this is a valid legal argument, but I understand it.

Let's not confuse arguments that benefit Apple with blind support of Apple. Intentionally making a phone that copies the iPhone is clearly wrong, IMO. This clock issue is quite a bit murkier.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Clock on iOS6 iPads is an homage to a 1944 design by Hans... by rsynnott on Friday September 21, 2012 @05:41AM (#4553030)

> I'm not sure if this is a valid legal argument

Well, a tribute isn't a legal thing (and trademark and patent infringement is not stealing). But yes, it'd be hard to see a design patent on the clock effecting a representation of the clock drawn on a screen (and any patent would in any case have long since expired) and trade dress and other consumer confusion stuff certainly wouldn't apply, as no-one is confused by the iPad into thinking it's a wall clock from the 40s.

[ Parent | on HN ]