Re:Privacy Harm Is Harm
by gdulli on Saturday October 04, 2025 @03:00PM
(#45475746)
The article made a case. You didn't refute it or make your own, you just said "nuh uh".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Privacy Harm Is Harm
by charcircuit on Saturday October 04, 2025 @05:10PM
(#45476745)
>you just said "nuh uh".
The article doesn't make a case. They are just saying "nuh uh" to the decision the court made.
Re:Privacy Harm Is Harm
by digitalPhonix on Sunday October 05, 2025 @03:43AM
(#45479650)
There's a 30ish page (not including all the legal template) brief explaining their arguement. How is that not making a case? There's even a excerpt from the brief going over one of their arguments.