Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blue planet

Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by ben_w on Saturday October 04, 2025 @10:42AM (#45473656)

At the moment, rapid and massive expansion seems likely with tech only just on the horizon.

Enough AI and robotics for an autonomous factory may be a mirage (such mirages have (metaphorically) happened before), but it seems like it's on the horizon.

Even with relatively mundane growth assumptions, that can go from "species inventing writing" to "Dyson sphere completed, is now sending out seeds to every accessible galaxy" on significantly less than the timescale of light crossing a spiral galaxy's disk.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by kingkawn on Saturday October 04, 2025 @10:49AM (#45473697)

Cmon the number of hypothetical extrapolations based on no data in these statements is beyond superstition to something like delusion

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by ben_w on Saturday October 04, 2025 @11:41AM (#45474109)

If I put citations into everything I write, I'd be a Wikipedia article, and people would still criticise the conclusions without reading any of them.

But contrawise, I do have data, they're broadly categorised as "history", "biology", and "all the stuff cited by Stuart Armstrong that time".

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by javier2 on Sunday October 05, 2025 @08:02AM (#45480890)

I think its the fact that if we really wanted to, we could probably make it happen already today. On a scale of a couple hundred million years, its possible we could reach most of our own galaxy, which is a small slice of time in the life span of the Milky Way. So the question remains, why hasn't this already happened, or has it?

[ Parent | on HN ]