News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by crazygringo on Saturday October 04, 2025 @10:00AM (#45473381)
I'm assuming they were referring to this term:

> n_e = the average number of planets that can potentially support life per star that has planets.

The fact that the planet is neither too hot nor too cold would seem to be a major component of this term:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Habitable_zone

Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by mr_mitm on Saturday October 04, 2025 @10:27AM (#45473549)
That's just your interpretation. Take the equation at its face value and it does allow for life originating around some deep sea vents, like JamesLeonis speculated.
Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by acestus5 on Saturday October 04, 2025 @10:31AM (#45473579)
yeah you are right the Drake equation does not assume Goldilocks zone.
Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by stouset on Saturday October 04, 2025 @12:59PM (#45474747)
It goes the other way around. The Goldilocks zone is a shorthand attempt at helping us guess how many planets out there are capable of supporting life.
Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by DennisP on Saturday October 04, 2025 @04:49PM (#45476576)
It does seem unlikely that such life forms would ever become spacefaring.
Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by rowanG077 on Saturday October 04, 2025 @05:05PM (#45476697)
That's a separate term in the equation.
Re:Earth was born dry until a cosmic collision made it a blu... by DennisP on Saturday October 04, 2025 @05:25PM (#45476850)
Yes, but we should consider these linkages when setting values. If we assume that volcanic vent life is very unlikely to become spacefaring, we should either leave it out of the "life" term, or leave it in but lower the probability of the "becomes spacefaring" term.