Re:Webbol: A minimal static web server written in COBOL
by tuveson on Friday October 03, 2025 @11:11AM
(#45463877)
People say “pick the best tool for the job” and then refuse to pick COBOL for their COmmon Business Oriented probLems
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Webbol: A minimal static web server written in COBOL
by graemep on Friday October 03, 2025 @12:03PM
(#45464469)
Why and when is the the "best tool for the job"?
Re:Webbol: A minimal static web server written in COBOL
by lazerman on Friday October 03, 2025 @01:20PM
(#45465302)
Whoosh
Re:Webbol: A minimal static web server written in COBOL
by ternaryoperator on Friday October 03, 2025 @06:08PM
(#45468401)
It's an ideal language for creating business reports, which is what it was originally designed to do. It has built-in commands for reading randomly or sequentially from a database and it has extensive report-formatting options.
It has other application capabilities, of course, but business reporting (especially complex reports) are its sweet spot.
Re:Webbol: A minimal static web server written in COBOL
by dardeaup on Friday October 03, 2025 @11:46AM
(#45464271)
They don't refuse to pick COBOL, they refuse to consider COBOL.
Re:Webbol: A minimal static web server written in COBOL
by pmontra on Friday October 03, 2025 @12:40PM
(#45464877)
They even forget that COBOL could run on their computers and servers.
Re:Webbol: A minimal static web server written in COBOL
by jsight on Friday October 03, 2025 @05:47PM
(#45468184)
That is true for MUMPS too. People overlook what an epic decision they could be making.
Re:Webbol: A minimal static web server written in COBOL
by slongfield on Friday October 03, 2025 @08:30PM
(#45469381)
The big problem with MUMPS is that as the "Massachusetts General Hospital Utility Multi-Programming System", it does not work well for development in other states. There's been some experimentation with using it in Wisconson, but a W is not an M.