Re:In Praise of RSS and Controlled Feeds of Information
by jasode on Friday October 03, 2025 @07:56AM
(#45461894)
>You prefer to let other people determine what you read?
There are multiple levels of delegation to the "wisdom of the crowd":
- visiting this HN website by itself is already letting people determine what you read. The stories are submitted by others.
- reading only the front page of just the top-voted 30 stories instead of doom scrolling the other 500 is another level of delegation
- inside of each story, only reading a subset of the most upvoted comments is another level
People do all 3 to various degrees because there's limited time to read.
Re:In Praise of RSS and Controlled Feeds of Information
by esseph on Friday October 03, 2025 @12:22PM
(#45464682)
> People do all 3 to various degrees because there's limited time to read.
_By far_, the best posts I have ever seen to this website were often ones that didn't get many comments, or may have even gotten reported.
Re:In Praise of RSS and Controlled Feeds of Information
by qmmmur on Friday October 03, 2025 @07:51AM
(#45461843)
Considering you define the heuristic seems like a daft argument for you to make
Re:In Praise of RSS and Controlled Feeds of Information
by SirHumphrey on Friday October 03, 2025 @11:02AM
(#45463772)
I prefer to also hear other people’s opinion about an article as a sort of a peer review.
You prefer to let other people determine what you read?