> It's not like the Gazans have any money to speak of.
This is more of an argument in favor of the other side. It immediately becomes clear why they don't have the money.
20 years of economic warfare where all exports were banned as a mechanism for destroying their economy being a primary reason.
https://web.archive.org/web/20100612001046/http://www.mcclat...
un data showing hundreds of trucks exporting goods from gaza every month:
It's not like the Gazans have any money to speak of.
> (or is irrelevant)?
If the way to prevent starvation is to flood the zone with food shipments, it's a moral imperative to do that. That it will also help keep the enemy fed is entirely beside the point, since causing starvation is not a legal or ethical form of warfare.