Re:Clean Hydrogen at a Crossroads: Why Methane Pyrolysis Des...
by burnt-resistor on Friday September 26, 2025 @09:22PM
(#45392599)
Serious cognitive dissonance and strawmanning. Using the sky as an open-air sewer does. No amount of "clean coal" or "clean hydrogen" will change the problem of normalization of continued ff extraction by greenwashing it.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Clean Hydrogen at a Crossroads: Why Methane Pyrolysis Des...
by kragen on Friday September 26, 2025 @10:08PM
(#45392766)
You don't seem to have addressed my argument, and parts of your response aren't even coherent, such as "Using the sky as an open-air sewer does." Possibly you are too upset to have a conversation successfully right now.
Re:Clean Hydrogen at a Crossroads: Why Methane Pyrolysis Des...
by burnt-resistor on Saturday September 27, 2025 @06:45AM
(#45394671)
> Be kind. Don't be snarky. Converse curiously; don't cross-examine. Edit out swipes.
> Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
> When disagreeing, please reply to the argument instead of calling names. "That is idiotic; 1 + 1 is 2, not 3" can be shortened to "1 + 1 is 2, not 3."
> Don't be curmudgeonly. Thoughtful criticism is fine, but please don't be rigidly or generically negative.
> Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community.
> Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.