Re:Everything that's wrong with Google Search in one image
by kragen on Wednesday September 24, 2025 @08:45PM
(#45367888)
No, they had no ads for several years. AdWords were introduced in 02000, at which point Google had existed (initially as google.stanford.edu) for four years, since 01996, which was 40% of the amount of time the Web had even existed. I started using Google in probably 01998, when people on Slashdot got excited about how much better their search quality was than AltaVista, but it probably wasn't until 01999 that I switched over completely—at first AltaVista still had better coverage.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Everything that's wrong with Google Search in one image
by zahlman on Wednesday September 24, 2025 @09:34PM
(#45368289)
Why the leading zeros on year numbers?
Re:Everything that's wrong with Google Search in one image
by defrost on Wednesday September 24, 2025 @09:38PM
(#45368323)
So that you ask yourself "Why the leading zeros on year numbers?"
If you like Brian Eno it engaged his curiosity also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_07003:_Bell_Studies_fo...
Re:Everything that's wrong with Google Search in one image
by kragen on Wednesday September 24, 2025 @09:35PM
(#45368298)
Just for fun.