News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Download responsibly by Dylan16807 on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @02:29AM (#45343482)
Torrents don't use anything like TCP congestion control and 100 connections will take a good chunk of bandwidth but much much less than 100 TCP flows.
Re:Download responsibly by dotwaffle on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @10:40AM (#45347719)
... What? You realise BitTorrent runs over TCP/IP right?
Re:Download responsibly by Dylan16807 on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @03:05PM (#45351355)
TCP is a fallback if it can't use https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Micro_Transport_Protocol

I should have said they avoid TCP in favor of very different congestion control, sorry.

Re:Download responsibly by dotwaffle on Tuesday September 23, 2025 @06:05PM (#45353355)
Interesting... It's been ~15 years since I last used BitTorrent personally, and I had asked a friend before replying and they swore that all their traffic was TCP -- though perhaps that may be due to CGNAT or something similar causing that fallback scenario you describe.

Thanks for the info, and sorry for jumping to a conclusion! Though my original point stands: Residential ISPs are generally not built to handle BitTorrent traffic flows (customer to customer or customer to other-ISP-customer across large geographic areas) so the bursty nature would cause congestion much easier, and BitTorrent itself isn't really made for these kinds of scenarios where content changes on a daily basis. CDNs exist for a reason, even if they're not readily available at reasonable prices for projects like OP!