The President is a Soviet planted saboteur, it's not that surprising, it's coming from the top down. I assume this is the US manufacturing revolution he has in mind.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stakhanovite_movement

>In 1988, the Soviet newspaper Komsomolskaya Pravda stated that the widely propagandized personal achievements of Stakhanov actually were puffery. The paper insisted that Stakhanov had used a number of helpers on support work, while the output was tallied for him alone.

What do you mean by this? My understanding is that Stakhanovism is kind of the opposite of US work culture in that it lionizes the worker and social contributions

Your understanding is somewhat incomplete. There is a strong top-down push to celebrate output maximization without inquiring too closely about if this output is meaningful, valuable, repeatable, or even happened at all.

It’s about making the productivity metrics go up, even if at the expense of real productivity or common sense. The man who it was named after ironically (unironically?) faked his own metrics

It doesn't seem to even be about making metrics go up. It's about telling a narrative-reinforcing story: That AI is great. It's worth it. Leadership is right to be obsessed with it.

I would have thought that in a fight between "fooling ourselves with a story" and "metrics go up" that the metrics would win, but it seems to not be the case.

what you said is what I was thinking. Thanks for phrasing it so eloquently

Same thing happened to work from home. Meta straight up sabotaged the reason for it's own rebrand in service of it.

How do you mean?

A return to the office mandate from a company that was not only selling augmented reality but specifically selling remote workplace themed augmented reality applications rather undermines the message.

Not really: Meta's overall brand was not in general about using AR headsets in the workplace, if you factor in IG and WA. Developing AR is not necessarily the same as using it for leisure let alone using it in the workplace, notwithstanding Meta's marketing claiming it could be used for that. (Are there any stats to show that business users in general ever believed Meta's marketing on AR? I'm not aware of any.)

Also, the RTO mandate can serve as a basis/pretext for layoffs and cost consolidation, although CXOs tend not to admit that directly.

Oh, if the narrative pressure is strong enough people will just fake the metrics.

The promise of replacing your expensive staff who talk back with cheap malleable AI is just too tempting.

> Stakhanovism is kind of the opposite of US work culture in that it lionizes the worker and social contributions

Lionizes the worker for their output. Just the same as quota or target driven systems. It's the same kind of lionization as "employee of the month" schemes, i.e. a sham to encourage people to work harder.

This is absolutely dead-on.