Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by lokar on Sunday September 21, 2025 @11:16AM
(#45323509)
Agreements like that should be considered unenforceable
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by Kranar on Sunday September 21, 2025 @12:17PM
(#45324019)
Then she would get no money either.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by lokar on Sunday September 21, 2025 @12:41PM
(#45324318)
I don't think that's true in most situations. I think most companies would still pay a severance out of a general effort to smooth things over, and some sense of social loyalties.
And some aspects of the agreement would be fine. No spilling actual business relevant secrets, nothing that would count as libel or slander, etc.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by Ekaros on Sunday September 21, 2025 @03:16PM
(#45325764)
Part of smoothing things over is implicit of explicit understanding that employee also smooths things over that is shut up after receiving the bribe.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by Kranar on Sunday September 21, 2025 @12:53PM
(#45324460)
You think a business pays money out of a sense of "social loyalty"?
Companies don't need to offer severance to prevent ex employees from spilling business secrets, doing so is a criminal offense.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by lokar on Sunday September 21, 2025 @03:36PM
(#45325949)
Companies are people, many people have positive feelings towards co-workers and people like them
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by smsm42 on Sunday September 21, 2025 @06:01PM
(#45327075)
True but not the ones who will be firing you. At least not in big corp, it would be some HR worker who doesn't know you from Adam and couldn't care less about you.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by lokar on Sunday September 21, 2025 @10:37PM
(#45328606)
They always have the manager, and the director and possibly VP will be in the loop and know what going on.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by smsm42 on Monday September 22, 2025 @12:56AM
(#45329210)
The immediate manager will be informed, but they can do nothing about it or in any way change the process or the result.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by smsm42 on Sunday September 21, 2025 @05:59PM
(#45327065)
Nope, they'd have security show you the door and maybe threaten to sue you into the ground if you talk. They choose mkney because money is easier, but if you take this option away, you just get the stick and no carrot.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by jsnell on Sunday September 21, 2025 @11:50AM
(#45323787)
But then Facebook would have had no incentive to offer the agreement to her. And she must have been very happy with what she got in the deal, given she gave up the option of talking about all the apparently horrible misdeeds she witnessed while they were still fresh, rather than a decade later.
Re:Meta exposé author faces bankruptcy after ban on criticis...
by godelski on Sunday September 21, 2025 @10:09PM
(#45328456)
Plenty of companies have nonenforcable clauses in their contracts. Either by momentum or stupidity. That's despite the inclusion of such conditions can often void a contract in its entirety.
Is there an incentive to have unenforceable clauses? Yes, of course. The same way one might be incentivized to say they will harm you if you do not do what they want even if they have no intention of harming you.
It's called "a bluff". Play some poker, you'll see how effective this strategy really is.