News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:David Lynch LA House by cjrp on Friday September 19, 2025 @11:14AM (#45302565)
> Someone that owns a $15M house and has very little other liquid assets is not poor, but they definitely don't qualify as wealthy.

Assuming they own the house outright, that absolutely does qualify as wealthy.

Re:David Lynch LA House by e40 on Friday September 19, 2025 @12:56PM (#45303859)
I didn't say it wouldn't. I said it didn't qualify as ready cash.
Re:David Lynch LA House by WalterBright on Friday September 19, 2025 @03:01PM (#45305169)
You can borrow against the house, and spend the cash.
Re:David Lynch LA House by JadeNB on Friday September 19, 2025 @01:03PM (#45303926)
> > Assuming they own the house outright, that absolutely does qualify as wealthy.

> I didn't say it wouldn't. I said it didn't qualify as ready cash.

I think you did say it didn't qualify as wealthy (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45301176):

> What people normally mean by wealth is easy access to cash. Someone that owns a $15M house and has very little other liquid assets is not poor, but they definitely don't qualify as wealthy.

Anyway, whatever it is, I think litigating Lynch's level of wealth on HN is probably not the most useful direction for this comment thread.