Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by bombcar on Thursday September 18, 2025 @09:51AM
(#45289714)
I really wonder why Discord didn’t start an enterprise offering called Concord. I’m sure there’s enough kids using it that it would get some traction.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by M4rkJW on Thursday September 18, 2025 @11:11AM
(#45290650)
It's quite fortuitous Discord never went down this path you've outlined. "Concord" is now a term synonymous with abject and astounding failure. "Unity" is also taken and fraught with negative associations. "Harmony" might be free.
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by dcrazy on Thursday September 18, 2025 @11:14AM
(#45290702)
“Harmony” is a line of programmable remote controls from Logitech.
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by OkayPhysicist on Thursday September 18, 2025 @07:01PM
(#45296062)
Yeah, Discord not going into competition with Slack or Teams has been an own-goal that I've been baffled by for years. Given that Slack apparently thinks their incredibly subpar offering is worth $200k a year, I can't imagine why Discord wouldn't roll out a "We'll run a standalone instance of Discord with your information siloed and DMs retained for legal purposes, with full Nitro/Boost perks for $ALOTOFMONEY/user" version of their software.