Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by bayindirh on Thursday September 18, 2025 @07:56AM
(#45288527)
It's pretty depressing to see how much performance and capacity we waste.
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by bombcar on Thursday September 18, 2025 @08:42AM
(#45288921)
Hush you. I need 48 cores at 5 GHz and 200 gigs of RAM to serve a simple status page.
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by bayindirh on Thursday September 18, 2025 @08:47AM
(#45288976)
I'm an HPC admin, I can (and will) make you serve this page from NIC's unused core. I need these cores for streaming cat videos.
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by bombcar on Thursday September 18, 2025 @09:07AM
(#45289181)
Yes, we did by 10,000 cores a year ago, no there is no capacity, yes we will run the ERP off an old win2k server, no we are not using 10k cores for seti@home.
Runs Prime95 like a baws
Re:Slack has raised our charges by $195k per year
by notpushkin on Thursday September 18, 2025 @09:23AM
(#45289391)
I’d love a self-hostable, in-browser Access. Preferably Access 97.
But if you're coming at it from a LAMP stack or otherwise having direct access to a real SQL database designed by intelligent people, it's pretty meh.