Re:Oracle, Silver Lake consortium to control 80% stake in Ti...
by asdff on Wednesday September 17, 2025 @06:12PM
(#45282003)
Most people aren't actively curating their feed like this. They see an attractive person, eyes wander for a few seconds longer than the usual post before scrolling away, and that is enough.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Oracle, Silver Lake consortium to control 80% stake in Ti...
by jghn on Thursday September 18, 2025 @08:25AM
(#45288754)
But I'd at least think that anyone who is complaining about what content they're seeing, the algorithm, etc knows enough to do this too. Especially on a site like ths.
Instead online discourse often revolves around this being an impossible task. Meanwhile on all the social media sites I use I have managed to keep algorithmic content to a minimum.
Re:Oracle, Silver Lake consortium to control 80% stake in Ti...
by asdff on Thursday September 18, 2025 @02:51PM
(#45293518)
What social media sites do you use where you've been successful at avoiding the algorithm? I don't see how it can be avoided. It is always trained in some way based on your estimated demography and what content you engage with slightly more than others.
Re:Oracle, Silver Lake consortium to control 80% stake in Ti...
by jghn on Friday September 19, 2025 @03:57PM
(#45305827)
Facebook, IG, Twitter, Bsky.
To be clear, I'm talking purely about being forced to see content from accounts you don't follow and not things like them choosing to show you content from one account more than another. Not all of them support my preference of pure chronological, so they will monkey with what I see amongst the things I follow. But all of them make it easy to quickly filter out and/or avoid any unwanted activity outside of sponsored ads.