This metric is not as important as it seems when they have ~5x the population.
It's certainly non-linear.
Does 5x the number of math graduates increase the number of people with ability like Terrance Tao? Or even meaningfully increase the number of top tier mathematicians? It really doesn't. Same with any other science or art. There is a human factor involved.
Suppose there's more than one. Then sampling from 5x the number of people increases the average number of him that you get (by about 5x).
funny that you mention this because many top AI talent from big tech companies are from chinnese Ivy league graduate
US literally importing AI talent war as highest as ever and yet you still have doubt
You are trying too hard to be right meanwhile 40% top AI talent in big tech is chinnese
so higher number = more chance smart people is indeed true and your argument is just waste of time
1. An h20 is about 1.5 generations behind Blackwell. This chip looks closer to about 2 generations behind top end Blackwell chips. So ~5ish years behind is not as impressive especially since EUV is likely going to be a major obstacle to catching up which China has no capacity for
2. Nvidia continues to dominate on the software side. Amd chips have been competitive on paper for a while and have had limited uptake. Now Chinese government mandates could obviously correct this after substantial investment in the software stack — but this is probably several years behind.
3. China has poured trillions of dollars into its academic system and graduates more than 3x the number of electrical engineers the US does. The US immigration system has also been training Chinese students but having a much more limited work visa program has transferred a lot of knowledge back without even touching IP issues
4. Of course ip theft covers some of it