News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Gentoo AI Policy. Parent comment

Re:Gentoo AI Policy by close04 on Monday September 15, 2025 @03:32AM (#45247085)
> They know how to ignore a PR if they don't want to review it

How well does that scale as the number of such contributions increases and the triage process itself becomes a sizable effort?

LLMs can inadvertently create a sort of DDoS even with the best intentions, and mitigating it costs something.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gentoo AI Policy by sampullman on Monday September 15, 2025 @04:10AM (#45247297)
Wait and see, then change the policy based on what actually happens.

I sort of doubt that all of a sudden there's going to be tons of people wanting to make complex AI contributions to LLVM, but if there are just ban them at that point.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gentoo AI Policy by yeasku on Monday September 15, 2025 @05:30AM (#45247777)
It has happend to Curl.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Gentoo AI Policy by danillonunes on Tuesday September 16, 2025 @05:20PM (#45268210)
Curl's case was related with its bug bounty, so when involving money the incentives are different.
[ Parent | on HN ]