News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A simplified S3 pricing page by kevindavis on Friday September 14, 2012 @04:24PM (#4523763)
let me know if folks have any problems / would like any additional features
Re:A simplified S3 pricing page by Sujan on Friday September 14, 2012 @04:54PM (#4523906)
Feedback to (imho) improve: 1. Mirror the top (prices) and bottom (description) 2. Add + sign between columns, = before last
Re:A simplified S3 pricing page by malvim on Friday September 14, 2012 @05:29PM (#4524073)
Love the idea and implementation, thanks a lot for this!

Though more granularity, as it has been said, would be nice, this is good enough for me and lots of people as it is right now.

What I REALLY would like to see (and I know this is not really a feature request for this, but just an idea I'm throwing out there) is this made for other Amazon AWS services as well.

Common scenarios, like "I would like to run a wordpress site on an EC2 instance serving a couple thousand hits per month", or "I'd like to store a 1 TB backup of my personal computer on Glacier and retrieve it when my computer crashes (say in 1 year)".

The point is, like you said yourself, if you're spending a lot of money, you shouldn't trust anyone else, but having these "ballpark figures" would be really useful for people that are considering these services.

Re:A simplified S3 pricing page by mfringel on Friday September 14, 2012 @06:07PM (#4524241)
To that point, it's hard to get a handle on how many GET, LIST, POST, etc. operations one would routinely do in the course of a blog or something else. While that can get pretty complex (especially if you end up throwing varnish in to minimize calls to your datastore), a calculator including various rules of thumb would be great.
Re:A simplified S3 pricing page by brugidou on Friday September 14, 2012 @04:39PM (#4523834)
Unfortunately i'm unable to use it on mobile :-(
Re:A simplified S3 pricing page by thenomad on Friday September 14, 2012 @06:33PM (#4524331)
I was looking at this for video hosting costs - any chance the bandwidth slider could go a bit (well, a lot) higher?