Not wanting to see people murdered for their opinions is a belief that can coexist with knowing the other side might want to kill me for mine.

I don’t think people want to murder for opinions, but rather the actions they take because of this opinions.

Actually, I think this opinion IS shared by most of the people on the other side. (Notice that I didn't mention which side I am on. I don't think it really matters.) But, to be sure, SOME of them feel differently.

The GOP and its entourage actively cheered on the Hortmans getting assasinated in their home by a republican guy disguised as a cop [1]. Trump was golfing during their funrerals and used the occasion to dunk on Tim Walz to the press. He didn't order that flags should be at half mast as he did for Charlie Kirk, depsite him not being a lawmaker. They also turned the attack on Paul Pelosi into a running gag [2], which lasted for years. There is no question as to which side of the political spectrum is normalizing and encouraging political violence, and I wish people scould stop with this very misplaced bothsideism.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/republican-s...

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_Paul_Pelosi#Misinfor...

Yeah, even cold, spineless Claude thinks one side / person is the most responsible for political violence https://claude.ai/share/46db846e-e701-4d79-8b28-9133cbfd4f73

It is wild that I completely forgot about the fire that endangered Shapiro and his family this year. Just to me, shows how crazy this year has been with events.

Why would Claude be an authority in this subject?

The difference is, while those 77% will say that, they will unilaterally rally behind the party leader that does the opposite.