Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by robrenaud on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @08:32PM
(#45206129)
But being wrong can cause downvotes.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by account42 on Thursday September 11, 2025 @05:44AM
(#45209619)
Popularity doesn't determine fact. If you cared about science instead of The Science you'd know that.
Re:Charlie Kirk shot at event in Utah
by AdieuToLogic on Wednesday September 10, 2025 @08:58PM
(#45206369)
> All (virtually all, it's not hyperbole) of the "misinformation" during covid turned out not to be that at all
> There was no science behind social distancing, or masks, or the (so called, it's not an actual one) vaccine
These assertions are provably wrong. Regarding "social distancing" specifically:
There was adequate empirical evidence for the effect of
social distancing at the individual level, and for partial
or full lockdown at the community level. However, at the
level of social settings, the evidence was moderate for
school closure, and was limited for workplace/business
closures as single targeted interventions.[0]
As to the science behind "masks" and "vaccines", the former can be trivially shown to limit the distance of oral particulate expulsion and the latter has enough published medical research to make verifying vaccine efficacy a matter of accepting facts.> Edit: I would like to remind people that downvotes do not, and never will, make me wrong
It is not the downvotes which make you wrong.
All (virtually all, it's not hyperbole) of the "misinformation" during covid turned out not to be that at all
There was no science behind social distancing, or masks, or the (so called, it's not an actual one) vaccine
Edit: I would like to remind people that downvotes do not, and never will, make me wrong