RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601

Re:RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601 by magnio on Sunday September 07, 2025 @04:23AM (#45156420)

Not exactly computer friendly, since filenames cannot contain ":" on Windows.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601 by afiori on Sunday September 07, 2025 @07:15AM (#45157199)

Then replace it with _ or anything else it is going to be equally understandable

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601 by integralid on Sunday September 07, 2025 @05:12AM (#45156625)

And cannot be longer than 8 characters on DOS.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601 by eadmund on Sunday September 07, 2025 @04:30AM (#45156438)

Not all computers are Windows!

And not all computer-users worry even a little bit about compatibility with Windows.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:RFC 3339 vs. ISO 8601 by theandrewbailey on Sunday September 07, 2025 @10:34AM (#45158492)

Considering that most normie non-tech people use Windows, compatibility with Windows is important.

[ Parent | on HN ]