News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks by KingOfCoders on Friday September 05, 2025 @02:03AM (#45135426)
"It isn't perfect."

Articles about some chemical process are fine, indeed often excellent.

Everything where facts get filtered and presented, is bad. Read about real world events - especially where different groups or countries were involved - in three different languages on Wikipedia, and you'd think three different universes exist.

Re:Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks by throwaway2037 on Friday September 05, 2025 @02:43AM (#45135625)

    > Read about real world events - especially where different groups or countries were involved - in three different languages on Wikipedia, and you'd think three different universes exist.
Can you give a clear example? I would like to read it for myself.
Re:Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks by BlueTemplar on Friday September 05, 2025 @03:06AM (#45135768)
It isn't so much as bad, as inevitable. And as you say, Wikipedia has the built-in antidote with the other language versions and the Talk pages.
Re:Wikipedia survives while the rest of the internet breaks by zahlman on Friday September 05, 2025 @09:21AM (#45138259)
> And as you say, Wikipedia has the built-in antidote with the other language versions and the Talk pages.

The Talk pages are just a first introduction to the sheer madness behind the scenes; one quickly starts to realize that relative few people are calling the shots in a lot of places and that their personal biases are causing serious problems. The "Reliable Sources" policy would be atrocious enough already (there are no objective processes for challenging a source's inclusion or exclusion from the informal list on a given topic, only political ones) without the "power user" editors who are clearly abusing it.